Sign in or 

|
MargyW |
60. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 14 2009, 9:56 PM EST
"I do believe I've read something once or twice about the CIA knowing about the 9/11 attacks and the US government doing nothing about it. Isn't that the same thing, except making it even worse by being in their own backyard? And on a larger scale?The 9/11 US Government involvement is conspiracy theory rubbish. The Beirut Incident is fact. Do you find this valuable? |
|
HardKore71 |
61. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 12:50 AM EST
"You're right."Hi Tex, I'm right about being hinky on my memory or my interpetation of what went down? Do you find this valuable? |
|
HardKore71 |
62. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 1:05 AM EST
"I do believe I've read something once or twice about the CIA knowing about the 9/11 attacks and the US government doing nothing about it. Isn't that the same thing, except making it even worse by being in their own backyard? And on a larger scale?I've read and seen different material regarding the 9/11 attacks (ex. Fahrenheit 911, Loose Change, etc), and it makes for interesting conversation and debate but I'm not going to say outright that the US government and the CIA knew in advance there was to be a definite attack on the US or were directly or indirectly responsible for those acts of terrorism. You're entitled to your opinion but it's kinda out there for you to make that kind of statement without being definitive proof about US government or CIA involvement in 9/11. Do you find this valuable? |
|
HardKore71 |
63. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 1:28 AM EST
| Post edited: Dec 15 2009, 1:29 AM EST
"Mossads mess cleaning up would be more along the lines of removing all sign of their ever having been there. Standard Mossad operational procedures.Margy are you referring to the William Buckley abduction and murder? Do you find this valuable? |
|
Kiamari |
64. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 2:35 AM EST
"I've read and seen different material regarding the 9/11 attacks (ex. Fahrenheit 911, Loose Change, etc), and it makes for interesting conversation and debate but I'm not going to say outright that the US government and the CIA knew in advance there was to be a definite attack on the US or were directly or indirectly responsible for those acts of terrorism. You're entitled to your opinion but it's kinda out there for you to make that kind of statement without being definitive proof about US government or CIA involvement in 9/11."No, no, no, you misunderstood my intention with that little bit. I was just pointing out that there are those who believe the US Government capable of the same things as Mossad, and that people should stop and think about the things they say before making arguments based on one perspective. I think I worded the initial proposition clumsily. It came out like I was flat-out accusing the US government of ignoring any warnings of terrorism, but I honestly didn't mean to. Do you find this valuable? |
|
HardKore71 |
65. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 3:12 AM EST
No worries, I understand now what you were trying to convey in your earlier post. And trust me I am not so naive to think that the US government (and other governments as well) hasn't done their fair share of highly questionable activities in just recent times like Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, and other things past or present we are in the dark about. We all live in dangerous times and there are factions around the world that in all likelyhood will try another terrorist attack on either the US or her allies in the future. I agree we must take a hard stand against terrorism of any sort, and I condone the use of harsh measures in counterterrorism, but at what price? At the cost of civil liberties? In trying so hard to stop the bad guys, that we become the bad guys? Eli would say the ends justify the means, but in truth does it?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
exlurker |
66. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 9:20 AM EST
"I believe that was what the 'increased presence' of Mossad in Somalia was about. Either they were hunting down the terrorist, or they were attempting to search for Ziva. Perhaps both, considering that they would have been together (assuming that Eli believed that she'd gotten in).I did think the increased presence of Mossad meant that they were trying to search for Ziva - I'd forgotten that there were still 2 agents left definitely alive but these are fuller & more convincing explanations for what Mossad were doing, which doesn't leave much good you can say about Eli David, unless Vance knows something he isn't sharing. I still like Michael Nouri in the role though, so I hope they can stretch out the confrontations for a season or two. Do you find this valuable? |
|
zivarox2200 |
67. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 3:21 PM EST
I think Eli / mossad were looking for Ziva after all Eli did really want Salim dead (in Alyliah he told Vance that Salim had killed one of his men) I think Ziva and Eli need to have a showdown prehaps in the US (not guns or anything but a lot of shouting) I think Eli is not a black and white character. He has lost many people and believed his job protected his family. The way i interpret Ziva description of Tali is that she was the most compassinate so obviously the favourite and when she died it could of been how Eli became so power hungry. It is suggested with the ages of his children that Ari did not become a mole until after that. The coment to Vance about Eli wanting his grandchildren to grow up safe and to be doctors etc obviously shows that he has seen what the contious fighting has caused in his own life and does not want it to continue. Eli obviously wants his last remaining child to live. Its obvious that Eli is like an onion and has many layers. And I would like a confrontation between Gibbs and Eli prehaps something mossad ends up at NCIS so Eli and Gibbs confrontation starts professinal and ends up personal.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
MargyW |
68. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 15 2009, 3:33 PM EST
"Margy are you referring to the William Buckley abduction and murder?"Can't remember the Station chiefs name. Possibly. Do you find this valuable? |
|
a_giblet |
69. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 21 2009, 5:19 PM EST
Just wanted to chime in with my $0.02. I agree that a Gibbs/Eli David showdown is inevitable. Eli David sees Gibbs as bullying Ziva into staying while we see Eli David as an uncaring, ruthless Mossad director who would kill his own flesh and blood for any cause. Gibbs would win, hands down, but I think when it was all said and done, Ziva would be the one to take Eli out to save Gibbs, and it wouldn't be because anyone told her to.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
emerellda |
70. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 21 2009, 8:19 PM EST
yes, its basically inevitable that gibbs will win, and Ziva will choose, by herself, but her takiing out eli to save gibbs, is a really interesting and definiatly plausible idea that I hadn't thought of, but could definitly be what hapens,
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Kiamari |
71. RE: Gibbs and Eli David
Dec 21 2009, 9:26 PM EST
NCIS isn't really the kind of show that rehashes scenarios like that. I sincerely doubt that Ziva will be the one to take out her father; the writers already had her take out her brother.Maybe she'll see the confrontation and just either walk on or stand idly by, maybe she'll even be the catalyst that starts it, but I don't think she'd take an active role. She's physically and emotionally scarred after her time in Somalia, and I don't think being actively involved in a confrontation between Gibbs and her father is something that she can handle, despite how good she is at hiding how the whole ordeal affected her. To be honest, I'm finding the fact that she's adjusting so well to be a tad unbelievable, but maybe it will be explained in later episodes. Either way, I don't think the writers would repeat a scenario so blatantly. Do you find this valuable? |